![]() ![]() … Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and community councils. ![]() When we understand what motivated Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies. ![]() This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. The Marxist’s global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can’t be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels’ grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. Hegel’s dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. Now, in the 21st century, Hegelian-Marxist thinking affects our entire social and political structure. In 1847 the London Communist League (Karl Marx and Frederick Engels) used Hegel’s theory of the dialectic to back up their economic theory of communism. Ultimately, the thesis comes into interaction with the antithesis to allow convention to prevail, leveraging and isolating Edna before she commits suicide.“…the State ‘has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State… for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'” Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144) Third, interaction between individuality and convention tips the balance in favor of convention for the following main reasons: Edna's compliance and ambivalence and Robert's wavering and estrangement. Second, individualism is mainly represented by Edna who struggles to put her inner self first, her misogamy, and her extramarital romances. First, convention in the novel is represented by stringent social norms, patriarchy, matrimony, and women's conformity with them. The study has managed to answer its key research questions. Hegel's framework of thesis, antithesis and synthesis is applicable to the analysis of the opposing themes. It examines the work to discover the vacillations of the heroine between rebellion and conformity and evaluate the outcome. The significance of the study lies in the fact that it fills a gap in knowledge that has not been fully addressed in relation to the theme of individuality and convention using Hegel's dialectics. This research paper studies the themes of individuality and convention in Kate Chopin's The Awakening from a Hegelian dialectic perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |